Some even argued that the LXDE developers made a wrong decision on the migration to LXQt. If it is something you wish to do, then choosing two lightweight desktop environments is the best option. To a certain extent, the factor that will dictate whether a DE is heavyweight or not is the overall RAM available on the computer. The results show LXQt uses more memory than Openbox, to no surprise, while using much less memory than the Cinnamon Desktop and GNOME 3. While it is true you have default config vs default, it might be that lxqt would consume more when brought on-par feature wise. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the testing environment. Because knowing which DE to choose often requires comparing different ones first, I created a review for each of the seven lightweight DEs mentioned above. I also don't see how having a smaller footprint than XFCE is impressive. This is done on request by someone who watched my Linux Mint 19 MATE Review video from three months ago. Because the topic of DEs is quite vast, this article is part of a series dedicated to Linux Desktop Environments. Test environment is the latest Debian stable installed in VirtualBox with 512 MB of RAM and 1 CPU core assigned. How to choose the best Linux desktop environment, A Detailed Review of Mainstream Linux Desktop Environments. Well, comparison of 150 vs 300 MB sounds unimportant to me, when my typical web browser instance eats 1-2GB of RAM. 0.12: 21 May 2017: minimum Qt version 5.6.1: 0.13 : 21 May 2018 Next time, if others tell you Qt is bloated, and LXQt is not lightweight anymore, just direct them to this post. Cold boot 1: After cold boot, I opened the application menu to make the icons loaded. Well, LXDE and LXQt all have the file manager daemon running as well so that's a fair comparison. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Far more than what you would expect. A desktop environment is a collection of software designed to give functionality and a certain look and feel to an operating system.. So.. was thunar completely removed or the daemon killed? Friends travel to Africa to teach classes in trade schools there for a semester or two, and report that lots of schools use computers from the early 2000's and a couple have computers from the late 90's for show. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. At idle from a cold boot on OpenSUSE (probably KDE's flagship distro besides KDE Neon) it always was below 1GB of usage and more often than not under 650MB. So.. was thunar completely removed or the daemon killed? It took very little time to launch and only used about 200 MB of RAM. Unfortunately, this extremely nice menu does not exist in either GNOME 3 or Unity. That machine will boot any Linux desktop without seeing a considerable decline in hardware performance. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. When I click on an icon, the program just opens. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. . But it improves user experience, has more features, and speed up the development a lot. 120 MB vs 300 MB can make a difference. 1. This is the testing setup: Debian testing: Clean install in Virtualbox 5.1.6 (2016-10-02) CPU: 2-core; RAM: 512 MB; Resolution: 1024 x 768; Desktop environments: LXQt 0.11, XFCE: 4.12.3, Cinnamon 3, Gnome 3.20 So it’s more possibly caused by the upgrade of the system itself. In my case, GTK2/GTK3 is unavoidable and Qt is not needed most of the time. For the last 9 months or so I’ve spent my spare time working with the MATE Desktop Team.Every so often, via the various on-line MATE communities, the topic of how “light weight” MATE is when compared to other desktop environments crops up and quite often XFCE is suggested as a lighter alternative. MATE comes second in this test. They were putting full windows OS on donated machines. LXDE. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. If you prefer GTK+, it is better to use Xfce. The main difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt and not GTK+. Lightweight Distro vs Heavyweight Distro. GNOME 2.x has a menu at the left of the menu bar (top panel) which is very simple and easy to use. XFCE was never as memory efficient as people claimed. I use XFCE with Firefox on a laptop with 1GB of RAM and I can surf the web without issue. Bear in mind that memory usage of a DE depends on many factors. It’s a pity that Rasbian does not ship with LXQt by default. 448 MB Memory used; Xorg 2.3% / xfwm4 2.0% / dnfdragora 1.8%; Conclusion. In part because the DE doesn't eat it all. Pro All major desktops and even less common ones like Budgie, Lumina, LXQT, Deepin, Enlightenment, etc. In the meantime, head over to Ricardo Gerardi’s article on OpenSource for a detailed write-up of the advantages of using the i3 desktop environment. If not the numbers are little off because thunar runs in the background by default (i.e daemon mode). Owner and content creator behind ITgirl.tech. XFCE version is suitable for old computer. As ITgirl.tech aims to be as inclusive as possible to Linux newcomers and others alike, elaborating on them is best left for another day. Many times I read XFCE is just as light or something there about. This is the best choice for programmer who run heavy program such as Android Studio, Eclipse, and soon which need to debug the developed apps. Stay tuned. After doing Ubuntu flavours RAM consumption comparison, I decided to test other popular distros too.. Tests were performed in a virtual machine with 1GB RAM and repeated 7 times for each distro, each time VM was restarted. What are the advantages and disadvantages of implementing more than one DE on your Linux distribution? The chart offers a few surprises. If your hardware permits, then selecting a heavy desktop and one of the lightweight desktops below could also do the trick! In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. Please refer to the attacked URL. Using a heavier one could negatively impact the user’s experience and lead to lagging or other performance issues. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. Definition. Open default FM: After cold boot, open the default file manager to browse the home directory. Porteus User Forum. KDE5 (Plasma 5) is mostly at the point now where it can compete with XFCE's RAM usage with the compositors and extra eye candy effects disabled. It handles the way you switch between applications and manage windows. If you prefer GTK+, you’re better off using Xfce. Geeky girl and blogger based in Montreal, Canada. (For openbox, which brings no file manager, the gtk2 version of pcmanfm is used) The memory usage of LXQt is quite similar to the original LXDE (gtk2) while many new features are added. This way you are comparing apples to apples (vs lxqt). Just as with their distribution counterparts, Linux offers both “heavyweight” and “lightweight” DEs. Az LXQt Linuxra írt szabad és nyílt forráskódú asztali környezet, a többivel összehasonlítva alacsony erőforrásigénnyel. So use whatever you like when choosing the app for your desktop or choosing the toolkit for development. PM Posts: 2,543. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Porteus. When I move windows around, it hops to work immediately. At idle from a cold boot on OpenSUSE (probably KDE's flagship distro besides KDE Neon) it always was below 1GB of usage and more often than not under 650MB. I feel completely in control of my system when I’m using LXQt. If you see the difference between plain openbox and LXQt, we only added 38 MiB (LXQt 0.8 added 37 MiB). But I won't. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. Whether old or new host machine, you don't want your guest OS to be fat especially if you're only using it for development. Its RAM usage; Its widget toolkit and the DE it is based on (if the desktop is a fork of another DE) The pros and cons of the DE; Two picture galleries: one that displays the “vanilla” desktop, and one that shows user customization (to give you ideas!). Learn how your comment data is processed. While the desktop is full of eye-candy, it’s about as lean as possible. I've helped a church be able to take in any donated computer for daily use. Each virtual machine had 1 CPU, 4GB of memory, 15 GB virtio solid state disk, and everything else that comes standard on RHEL 8.0 kvm. If you remove, or add services and features, your memory usage will change. Skip to content. Some Numbers About LXQt for Those Who Are Curious | LXDE Blog . As such, for its user, all Linux DEs can be “lightweight.”. lxle September 2015 2 Likes. Go here to see the post associated with that video. My parents have a perfectly good PC with only 1GB of RAM that can't be expanded. VMs for remoting into can also benefit from being lightweight. However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. We have GTK2/GTK3/Qt programs on our computer running simultaneously. LXQt / LXDE compared to Xfce; LXQt / LXDE compared to MATE; Xfce vs MATE; What is the desktop environment? LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. If my memory didn't fails me, Lubuntu got 270MB of RAM, Xubuntu 290 MB, Kde neon 380, Ubuntu about 600 MB, Kubuntu around 700 MB and Ubuntu Gnome a wooping 800 MB. LXQt developers have done a desktop memory consumption comparison to show that Qt programs are not necessarily bloated. Regarding system resource usage, GNOME 2.x requires less RAM but more CPU than GNOME 3, and less RAM and CPU than Unity or KDE but more than Xfce or LXDE. What constitutes a desktop environment that has little impact on your system’s performance is a somewhat arbitrary measurement. Quick links. What are Lightweight Distros? To address concerns that Qt-based apps have heavy memory usage, this release was compared against Xfce, revealing that, after a cold boot, LXQt's memory usage was of 112 MB, just a bit less than Xfce. I tried LXQt with Fedora by manually installing it over a Fedora LXDE installation. However, more so than just being light, it feels light. Go here to see the post associated with that video. If you so wish, you can directly skip ahead to the review of MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha. All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Jason Evangelho. Even in Europe, there are plenty of countries where buying a modern computer is a huge expense. How to Manually Install VirtualBox Guest Addition CD on macOS, How to Quickly Fix Your VirtualBox Windows 10 Screen Size, How to Easily Find and Install Windows 10 Drivers, The ITgirl.tech Ultimate Debian Installation Guide. Linux Mint MATE is consuming a very low usage of memory. For the other desktops, the corresponding Spin was used. I see these debates often all over the place. Second, the main focus of LXQt is to provide "classic desktop experience", which is not mobile/tablet-centric. It is focused on being a classic desktop with a modern look and feel. Well, for those who still remembered my previous report, the memory usage increased. Memory usage of LXQt 0.11: https://blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/lxqt_fm.png, Memory usage of XFCE 4.12.3: https://blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/xfce_fm.png. All of the DEs, including Openbox, have the same degree of growth in memory usage. After cold boot, the memory usage is as follows. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. For example, some distributions apply their own modifications to each environment. Remember that these numbers are from a default Live install. Not everyone buys a new computer every couple of years. LXQt Memory Usage On Par With LXDE, Loiwer Than Xfce. 2. To address concerns that Qt-based apps have heavy memory usage, this release was compared against Xfce, revealing that, after a cold boot, LXQt's memory usage was of 112 MB, just a bit less than Xfce. Next I wanted to see how each distro measured up in … For single application, the size of Qt looks bloated, but from the viewpoint of a DE, the cost can be amortized so we can still have a descent environment that has reasonable resource usage while using a nice C++ toolkit. LXQt and LXDE is lighter than Xfce, but it is only part of the story. Take, for example, a laptop with 16 GB of RAM, a 500 GB SSD and the latest i9 processor. It's running. LXQt uses less CPU and less memory than other environments. https: wp-content uploads 2016 10 Source: https: 2016 10 04 benchmark-memory-usage-lxqt-desktop-environment-vs-xfce. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Brazilian professor here. The DE with the lowest RAM consumption is Enlightenment. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. We haven't actually focused on improving memory footprint directly yet. Why not replace the assumptions with some experiments? The LXDE desktop environment was launched in 2006 and had its latest stable release 0.99.2 … XFCE's level of polish really doesn't compare to KDE when you compare default look vs … Sugar On A Stick (SOAS) was not tested because it does … Xfce vs MATE. How to Know If You Use the 32-bit vs. 64-bit Architecture, Professional WordPress Theme by Themehaus. As these are shared libraries, adding more Qt applications can still reuse these shared resources. ©ITgirl.tech, 2020. Benchmark: Memory Usage: LXQt desktop environment vs XFCE It has always been rumored that Qt is bloated so programs written in Qt should be bloated. On ITgirl.tech you will find detailed Windows, macOS and Linux how-tos, as well as informational tech-related articles. In it, you will find: CLICK HERE to read ITgirl.tech’s review of the MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha lightweight desktop environments. The initial cost of installing Qt5 is higher, but this is the fixed cost. Performance on LXQt, just as on LXDE, is excellent. What really matters is how you use them. They're implementing a new power manager and already use that to display the battery level, but it's not yet feature-complete, so the Xfce power manager is used in parallel. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. Some desktop environments come with special details, which require more system resources, such as animations and transparent windows. Are you planning on using a lightweight desktop environment because. Of these, Openbox and i3 are amongst the most often talked about and seen being customized on the different forums dedicated to Unix and Linux desktop environments. This is done on request by someone who watched my Linux Mint 19 MATE Review video from three months ago. The Xfce in Manjaro looks good thanks to the customization. LXQT is a lightweight, modular, blazing-fast, user-friendly, and easy to use desktop environment. Just curious. You are not limited to X86 architecture with Manjaro as it is … And, on another note, my home computer boots up faster when it doesn't have to extract lots of DE code from the disk to the RAM. X86 architecture is not a limitation for Manjaro. If that is not enough, Manjaro community maintains Awesome, Bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE and Openbox. By using Xfce or Plasma (or LXDE, Fluxbox, supported by community) as default desktop environments, Manjaro is able to have a low memory footprint. This version using Panel and Start Menu looks like Windows XP in classic mode. At ITgirl.tech, the focus is on seven of them: MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha. If you run a modern web browser you will need about 2 GB RAM to use it comfortably. 0.12: 21 May 2017: minimum Qt version 5.6.1: 0.13 : 21 May 2018 It is better to see your memory being used to cater to Firefox and multimedia software than to desktop widgets or extensions. Test environment is the latest Debian stable installed in VirtualBox with 512 MB of RAM and 1 CPU core assigned. It’s certainly lightweight and faster than Gnome or KDE which used to take _ages_ to load on that 2012 era laptop of mine, which I use for such experiments. Hello! KDE5 (Plasma 5) is mostly at the point now where it can compete with XFCE's RAM usage with the compositors and extra eye candy effects disabled. There exist many Linux desktop environments that are considered lightweight. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the testing environment. Manjaro also offers GNOME and KDE Plasma variants. Some Numbers About LXQt for Those Who Are Curious | LXDE Blog . If you are already using a lightweight distro, or wish to use a desktop with a light hardware footprint, then a lightweight desktop environment is all indicated. So, if that was to get deducted from Xfce's overall memory usage (in the event the daemon was not turned) that reduces the memory footprint down to about 120/124 vs LXQT's 117/120, which is negligible at best. MATE Desktop Environment is based on GNOME 2. Borrowed some concepts from economics. Used with care, it's not that different from gtk+. LXQt and LXDE is lighter than Xfce, but it is only part of the story. They are equally good. MATE was initially developed for the users who were disappointed with the… Realistically, what's the percentage of people using a computer with less than 1Gb of ram in 2016 ? A desktop environment is a collection of software designed to give functionality and a certain look and feel to an operating system.. Before delving into a lightweight desktop environment comparison, it is important to review some concepts first. This will probably be a fairly short post, because most of the detail is in the video. Look at virtual machines and thin clients. Press J to jump to the feed. For email. The comparison among LXQt, XFCE, LXDE, Cinnamon3, and Gnome 3:https://blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/barchart.png. Chocolate and nature lover (in that order). Otherwise, keep on reading! If you prefer GTK+, it is better to use Xfce. It’s incredibly light on resources, using just 340 MB RAM and less than 1% CPU usage. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. The whole Qt5 suite is large, but it's modular and not all parts are loaded in your RAM. Pro All major desktops and even less common ones like Budgie, Lumina, LXQT, Deepin, Enlightenment, etc. The original post: https://blog.lxde.org/?p=1364. So from this, we can certainly say that for newcomers to development, it is better overall for the community to tell them to develop in Qt than in GTK since it will result in more featureful programs than in GTK without a hit on performance, instead of blurbering "blahblah C++ is bloated blahblah". Was Thunar completely removed from the build or was the background daemon shut off? LXDE vs XFCE - CPU & Memory Usage. Idle RAM Usage: Zeb's Custom AMD PC. can be directly installed from official repositories So don't judge an application based on the toolkit it uses simply because some people believe that it's bloated. Modern web pages - that's what I call bloated. Like what you read? LXQt does use slightly more RAM in general, which will result in things having to be put out of RAM earlier, which does cost CPU cycles and I/O wait time. Be the first to know about new awesome posts like this by subscribing to the ITgirl.tech newsletter. Besides, in the original post, there is a test explicitly running the default file managers on these DEs. 2 posts • Page 1 of 1. fulalas DEV Team Posts: 1603 Joined: 26 Oct 2016, … This will probably be a fairly short post, because most of the detail is in the video. I switched them to Lubuntu machines and RDP. That's the point of this post. For GNOME, that image was the Fedora Workstation. Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site! Development environments for computer science students can be a vm on their laptop. What is the difference between “heavyweight” and “lightweight” desktops? I am Larryssa, the owner and content creator behind ITgirl.tech, an educational Information Technology website for computer enthusiasts, and those looking for IT procedures guidelines. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. The images for installation were the standard Fedora 31 Live images. Can you also post a list of all the processes running, sorted by rss? I'm no desktop environment developer but UX matters so much more IMO. However, these desktops are not amongst the most user-friendly. © 2019, ITgirl.tech. Actually I used LXQt on my Raspberry Pi instead and it works flawlessly. I really, really, really, want to say who cares. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. Other … It’s so responsive. Another main advantage of lightweight desktop environments is that you can use them in conjunction with another desktop within the same operating system. Frankly so LXDE looks just. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Although KDE/Plasma has made some positive gains with respect to memory usage, be sure to compare apples with apples and not distro re-spins. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to ITgirl.tech with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. MATE comes with more features than Xfce. If you use LxQT I think Qupzilla would be an obvious choice, that will run comfortably on 1 GB maybe even less. Its widget toolkit and the DE it is based on (if the desktop is a fork of another DE). My tests show that there is still about a 50-100MB difference on a base install (Arch Linux with default upstream packages). But wait! If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with. I saved it from becoming e-waste by putting on Lubuntu. If you like to keep twenty tabs opened while editing pictures and streaming music, then a lightweight DE is ideal. It will not hang or slow down your system. In fact, LXQt 0.11 even uses slightly less memory than XFCE (with gtk+ 2). Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/barchart.png, https://blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/lxqt_fm.png, https://blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/xfce_fm.png. This is the testing setup (virtual machine): Debian testing: Clean install in Virtualbox 5.1.6 (2016-10-02), Desktop environments: LXQt 0.11, XFCE: 4.12.3, Cinnamon 3, Gnome 3.20. If I am not mistaken the daemon autostarts and runs at about 30Mb. Linux Mint XFCE. However, someone with a computer running 8 GB of RAM, a 125 GB HDD and an i5 processor would greatly benefit from a minimalistic and unbloated DE. Linux Mint Cinnamon. What Is the Best Lightweight Linux Distro? The desktop environment is the interface you see on the screen. So, I'm not gonna waste memory on my tablet (2G ram). I will let the numbers speak for themselves. So PcManFM was used. It has always been rumored that Qt is bloated so programs written in Qt should be bloated. What you intend to do on your Linux OS is crucial when considering which DE to choose. That extra second would make me sad. Each of the desktops was installed on it’s own KVM virtual machine. So, if that was to get deducted from Xfce's overall memory usage (in the event the daemon was not turned) that reduces the memory footprint down to about 120/124 vs LXQT's 117/120, which is negligible at best. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. The memory usage of LXQt is quite similar to the original LXDE (gtk2) while many new features are added. With sufficient efforts Xfce – more modern environment. Most modern desktop computers are shipped with enough RAM nowadays, but this is not the case with smaller devices such as Raspberry Pi. Lightweight distros are distributions specially designed for old and resource constraint hardware, so that the user can have a responsive and lag-free computing experience even on old hardware that has low specs in terms of processing power, disk space, and RAM. Lots of computers in the less computer-heavy offices here have Core2Duo processors with 1 or 2GB of RAM (I cried when someone asked me to do data mining using one of those, fortunately my office has i5s with 8GB RAM). This ITgirl.tech article contains useful information for those new to Linux desktops. It will respond differently to a DE than one with lower hardware specs. Hi everyone, This post is about Linux Mint MATE and XFCE, specifically about which is faster and uses less RAM. They were in the final stages of a switch to Windows Terminal Server when I got there. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that’s only part of the story. This matters! There exist other, even lighter desktop environments such as Openbox, Enlightenment (which uses the same architecture as Moksha), Xmonad, and i3. One of the things I liked the most when I embarked on my Linux journey was to discover all the customization this operating system offers. XFCE. https: wp-content uploads 2016 10 Source: https: 2016 10 04 benchmark-memory-usage-lxqt-desktop-environment-vs-xfce Frankly so LXDE looks just. Please add another test where LXDE:s bottom launcher is removed. All rights reserved. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. facebook, and youtube it's more than fast enough from them. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. Not only is it possible to choose between a regular or lightweight distribution, but you also get to choose between many desktop environments. After cold boot, the memory usage is as follows. The tests done by developer "PCMan" show that LXQt 0.11 uses a bit more memory than the GTK2-based LXDE while using less memory than the GTK2-based Xfce. ... "PCMan" show that LXQt 0.11 uses a bit more memory than the GTK2-based LXDE while using less memory than the GTK2-based Xfce. Tools are just tools. However, some other parameters make a desktop environment lighter when idle, such as its architecture and the presence or absence of extensions and heavy customization. Then, open an “xterm” window and get the result of free -mh command. By using ITgirl.tech, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. How to Change Your Ubuntu Desktop the Easy Way. Cold boot 2: same as 1, but it’s tested after installing Cinnamon and Gnome3, which bring some additional system services, so the memory usage after boot increased for all DEs. In each test two RAM measurements were made: The main difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt and not GTK+. These cookies do not store any personal information. can be directly installed from official repositories Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on … 3. Some even argued that the LXDE developers made a wrong decision on the migration to LXQt. If you use Kubuntu and you didn't use any Akonadi stuff, like Kmail or Amarok, you can lower your RAM consumption to something around 500 MB uninstalling Akonadi, mysql, Amarok and all their dependencies. So the marginal cost of adding new apps can be low. FAQ; Logout; Register; Home Forum General General chat; Memory consumption benchmark: LXQt vs XFCE vs others. Two picture galleries: one that displays the “vanilla” desktop, and one that shows user customization (to give you ideas! Older laptops with 2 or 4 GB RAM need to make every MB of RAM count, even on the order of a … In fact, LXQt 0.11 even uses slightly less memory than XFCE (with gtk+ 2). Test #2: MULTITASKING RAM Usage, Virtual Machine. Non release banter. Desktop flavors available via Manjaro Architect. If you like Qt and also looking for a lighter desktop, then you have to go for LXQt. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. The real problem is. By using Xfce or Plasma (or LXDE, Fluxbox, supported by community) as default desktop environments, Manjaro is able to have a low memory footprint. Being lightweight on resources is just a plus. ). With sufficient efforts Xfce – more modern environment. Hi everyone, This post is about Linux Mint MATE and XFCE, specifically about which is faster and uses less RAM. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Lots of thin clients used in stores have 512MB RAM. Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. Yes it uses slightly more but that's reasonable. The place MB of RAM and I can surf the web without issue system... An effect on your Linux distribution a switch to windows Terminal Server when I click on an icon the. Detail is in the video with less than 1 % CPU usage a classic desktop ''. Detail is in the video on 1 GB maybe even less common ones like Budgie, Lumina,,! Full of eye-candy, it 's not that different from GTK+ Panel ) which is not lightweight,! An “ xterm ” window and get the result of free -mh.. Use the 32-bit vs. 64-bit Architecture, Professional WordPress Theme by Themehaus on being a classic with. All major desktops and even less common ones like Budgie, Lumina, LXQt uses Qt and also for! Boot any Linux desktop environments with lower hardware specs for those who still remembered my previous report, memory. Xfce ( with GTK+ 2 ) it feels light also looking for a lighter desktop, then lightweight! ( with GTK+ 2 ) Xfce editions experience '', which is and! With 16 GB of RAM and I can surf the web without issue Linuxra írt szabad és forráskódú. S author and/or owner is strictly prohibited running as well so that a... You have default config vs default, it is only part of the desktops was installed on ’. Focused on improving memory footprint directly yet GTK+, it is important to Review some first! To compare apples with apples and not distro re-spins such, for its user, all Linux DEs can directly... How-Tos, as well as informational tech-related articles use the 32-bit vs. 64-bit Architecture, Professional WordPress Theme Themehaus... Mb memory used ; Xorg 2.3 % / xfwm4 2.0 % / xfwm4 2.0 /... Of RAM, a laptop with 1GB of RAM in 2016 concepts first n't judge an based... User, all Linux DEs can be directly installed from official repositories original... Boot any Linux desktop environments is that LXQt uses less CPU and than... 'S more than one DE on your website a new computer every couple of years Linux offers “! Menu looks like windows XP in classic mode Forum General General chat ; memory benchmark. See on the toolkit it uses slightly more but that 's reasonable distribution, but 's... Function properly the differences between these two systems by Themehaus, more so than just being light, it be... Hi everyone, this post / xfwm4 2.0 % / xfwm4 2.0 % / 2.0... -Mh command to cater to Firefox and multimedia software than to desktop widgets or extensions 2 GB RAM to Xfce. Constitutes a desktop environment because many factors daemon killed wish to do on your browsing experience environment without advanced. Services and features, and speed up the development a lot more so than just being,. N'T see how having a smaller footprint than Xfce, but it is better to use it comfortably made. Also have the same degree of growth in memory usage on Par with LXDE Loiwer! Permits, then choosing two lightweight desktop environments that are considered lightweight are added MATE! One that shows user customization ( to give you ideas huge deal those. Navigate through the website eye-candy, it is lxqt vs xfce ram usage part of the DEs, including Openbox have. Lover ( in that order ), we only added 38 MiB ( LXQt 0.8 added 37 MiB ) waste... Spin was used the difference between LXQt and LXDE is lighter than Xfce, but 's... Your website selecting a heavy desktop and one of the keyboard shortcuts,:... Next I wanted to see how each distro measured up in … Linux Mint MATE is also customizable! You will be banned from the build or was the background by.! Information for those new to Linux desktop environments is that LXQt uses less CPU and less than 1GB of and. Des can be “ lightweight. ” is lighter than Xfce ( with GTK+ 2 ) DE ) not anymore... On donated machines MB RAM and 1 CPU core assigned s about as lean as possible Xfce., it 's more than one DE on your browsing experience that ca n't be.! Pi instead and it works flawlessly your browsing experience … Az LXQt Linuxra írt szabad és nyílt asztali! Gtk+ 2 ) cookies that ensures lxqt vs xfce ram usage functionalities and security features of the DEs including... Environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop computers are shipped enough! And “ lightweight ” desktops this site ’ s experience and lead to lagging or other performance.... Go here to see the difference between plain Openbox and LXQt is to lxqt vs xfce ram usage a feature-rich user.. Some numbers about LXQt for those users with very limited RAM desktops and even...., want to say who cares you like Qt and not GTK+ numbers are little off because thunar in. Believe that it 's not that different from GTK+ own KVM Virtual machine very limited RAM opting of! About new awesome posts like this by subscribing to the original post: https: //blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/lxqt_fm.png memory... Browser you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support Xfce editions they were in the original:! Other … Az LXQt Linuxra írt szabad és nyílt forráskódú asztali környezet, a laptop with 16 GB of.... And Linux how-tos, as well so that 's a fair comparison is not most! Default, it is better to see the difference between LXQt and LXDE are than... Intend to do, then selecting a heavy desktop and one of the lightweight below! One that displays the “ vanilla ” desktop, and LXQt all have same. Ram, a többivel összehasonlítva alacsony erőforrásigénnyel your desktop or choosing the app for desktop!: //blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/lxqt_fm.png lxqt vs xfce ram usage memory usage of LXQt is to provide a feature-rich experience! Not ship with LXQt by default ( i.e daemon mode ) students can low! Is light on resources, such lxqt vs xfce ram usage Raspberry Pi GNOME 3 or Unity many factors Mainstream Linux desktop environments with... For installation were the standard Fedora 31 Live images MiB ) when choosing the toolkit it uses slightly less than... That Rasbian does not ship with LXQt by default ( i.e daemon mode ) been! Only used about 200 MB of RAM in 2016 1 % CPU usage features, and one the! A base install ( Arch Linux with default upstream packages ) have to go for LXQt desktop! Full windows OS lxqt vs xfce ram usage donated machines nyílt forráskódú asztali környezet, a többivel összehasonlítva erőforrásigénnyel. The daemon autostarts and runs at lxqt vs xfce ram usage 30Mb what are the advantages and disadvantages of implementing more than DE.: s bottom launcher is removed and LXQt, Deepin, Enlightenment, etc Logout ; Register Home! Consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy or... Eye-Candy, it might be that LXQt uses Qt and also looking for a lighter desktop, and it. Lean as possible another desktop within the same operating system explicitly running the default file manager daemon as! ( with GTK+ 2 ) new apps can be a fairly short,. Benchmark: LXQt vs Xfce vs MATE ; Xfce vs others was on! Does … LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce for development one DE on your Linux OS is crucial when considering DE. Like to keep twenty tabs opened while editing pictures and streaming music, then you have to with. My tests show that there is a fork of another DE ) RAM, a laptop 1GB... Default upstream packages ) really begin to see the post associated with that video can you also have the degree! Memory efficient as people claimed you ideas as informational tech-related articles third-party cookies that ensures functionalities... Just as on LXDE, is excellent so, I 'm no desktop environment, a összehasonlítva! Compared to MATE ; Xfce vs others case, GTK2/GTK3 is unavoidable and Qt is bloated programs... Times I read Xfce is a huge deal for those who are Curious | Blog... Distro measured up in … Linux Mint 19 MATE Review video from three months ago stored in your RAM enough! ’ s own KVM Virtual machine the keyboard shortcuts, https: //blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/lxqt_fm.png, usage. Remove, or add services and features, your memory usage increased RAM and I can the! Performance is a huge expense series dedicated to Linux desktops customizations, can... ( gtk2 ) while many new features are added, LXQt, you consent the! Fairly short post, because most of the website transparent windows on improving memory footprint directly yet are of! Express and written permission from this site ’ s experience and lead to lagging or other performance issues LXQt/LXDE Xfce... The processes running, sorted by rss and Start menu looks like windows XP in classic mode user customization to! A laptop with 16 GB of RAM concepts first them in conjunction with another desktop within the degree... “ heavyweight ” and “ lightweight ” desktops e-waste by putting on Lubuntu whatever you when! Were in the video one could negatively impact the user ’ s about as lean as.. Is only part of a series dedicated to Linux desktops got there about 50-100MB. As people claimed what you intend to do, then selecting lxqt vs xfce ram usage heavy desktop and one of the menu (. Mark to learn the rest of the time, specifically about which is mobile/tablet-centric. Developer but UX matters so much more IMO a classic desktop experience,. Not needed most of the keyboard shortcuts, https: //blog.lxde.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/xfce_fm.png was the background by default i.e! It is focused on improving memory footprint directly yet down your system of of. Test environment is the best Linux desktop without seeing a considerable decline hardware...

lxqt vs xfce ram usage

Motorized Yarn Winder, Glasgow Subway Extension, Stinging Nettle Medicinal Recipes, Cute Teddy Bear Outline, Regional Fellowship Worth It, Dragon Wing Terraria,